|
motosdeagua.es |
|
Member

Group: Members
Posts: 78
Member No.: 10
Joined: 03-July 08

|
Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either.
|
|
|
|
Narek |
|
Member
    
Group: Members
Posts: 626
Member No.: 137
Joined: 18-August 07

|
"Justin"
| QUOTE | | Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. |
There is no confirmation anymore - it was a pointless waste of time for a user to select to logoff or shutdown an XP system then then be asked again what they want to do. You are now assumed to be competent and that when you click to shutdown that is what you want to do , since you have to actively select one button then from a menu. Am I the only one just getting so frustrated with people complaining about Vista nanny'ing them with UAC etc and then they complain that they do not have to confirm an action they selected themselves? Mike Brannigan
|
|
|
|
bap |
|
Member
    
Group: Members
Posts: 782
Member No.: 503
Joined: 12-October 07

|
On Tue, 01 May 2007 08:01:55 -0400, Justin wrote:
| QUOTE | | Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. |
Why do you need double confirmation when you want to shutdown or logoff or any of the other choices you're presented with? You click on Start, you hover over the little arrow and a menu appears asking what you want to do. I bet you're one of those dolts that switches the lights off in a room, then switches them back on again, just to make they were off. Right?
|
|
|
|
TGKprog |
|
Member
   
Group: Members
Posts: 442
Member No.: 953
Joined: 14-October 07

|
Many people want "selective" confirmations. They we would have thousands of posts here as how to configure *that* function! Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Mike Brannigan"
| QUOTE | "Justin" Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. There is no confirmation anymore - it was a pointless waste of time for a user to select to logoff or shutdown an XP system then then be asked again what they want to do. You are now assumed to be competent and that when you click to shutdown that is what you want to do , since you have to actively select one button then from a menu. Am I the only one just getting so frustrated with people complaining about Vista nanny'ing them with UAC etc and then they complain that they do not have to confirm an action they selected themselves? Mike Brannigan |
|
|
|
|
redneonrt |
|
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 9
Member No.: 735
Joined: 05-February 08

|
Justin wrote in news:#addEi#iHHA.3940 TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:
| QUOTE | | Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. |
Justin, yo should not post using this name here. You MAY be mistaken for another Justin that is already here.
|
|
|
|
shaheer |
|
Member

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Member No.: 347
Joined: 22-August 07

|
"Mike Brannigan" news:0C3036CB-4F8D-4F7A-ABDC-
| QUOTE | | Am I the only one just getting so frustrated with people complaining about Vista nanny'ing them with UAC etc and then they complain that they do not have to confirm an action they selected themselves? |
No you are not the only one lol.
|
|
|
|
danieloto |
|
Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 107
Member No.: 1017
Joined: 30-May 08

|
Adam Wrong Justin. Time to look around a bit bud. Thanks Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "Adam Albright"
| QUOTE | On Tue, 01 May 2007 08:01:55 -0400, Justin <drazzi8 hotmail.com wrote: Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. Why do you need double confirmation when you want to shutdown or logoff or any of the other choices you're presented with? You click on Start, you hover over the little arrow and a menu appears asking what you want to do. I bet you're one of those dolts that switches the lights off in a room, then switches them back on again, just to make they were off. Right?
|
|
|
|
|
hhyipstats11 |
|
Member
   
Group: Members
Posts: 402
Member No.: 1177
Joined: 02-March 08

|
| QUOTE | | Many people want "selective" confirmations. |
Absolutely correct. It is yes or no, 0 and 1, On or Off, it's about options for people to select. Are they using fresh graduates now and all the gurus left to Google or retired? "Richard Urban"
| QUOTE | Many people want "selective" confirmations. They we would have thousands of posts here as how to configure *that* function!
Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Mike Brannigan" "Justin" Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. There is no confirmation anymore - it was a pointless waste of time for a user to select to logoff or shutdown an XP system then then be asked again what they want to do. You are now assumed to be competent and that when you click to shutdown that is what you want to do , since you have to actively select one button then from a menu. Am I the only one just getting so frustrated with people complaining about Vista nanny'ing them with UAC etc and then they complain that they do not have to confirm an action they selected themselves? Mike Brannigan |
|
|
|
|
xcessi |
|
Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 147
Member No.: 1036
Joined: 17-September 07

|
Should have read - It is NOT yes or no... "xfile"
| QUOTE | Many people want "selective" confirmations. Absolutely correct. It is yes or no, 0 and 1, On or Off, it's about options for people to select. Are they using fresh graduates now and all the gurus left to Google or retired? "Richard Urban" Many people want "selective" confirmations. They we would have thousands of posts here as how to configure *that* function!
Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Mike Brannigan" "Justin" Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. There is no confirmation anymore - it was a pointless waste of time for a user to select to logoff or shutdown an XP system then then be asked again what they want to do. You are now assumed to be competent and that when you click to shutdown that is what you want to do , since you have to actively select one button then from a menu. Am I the only one just getting so frustrated with people complaining about Vista nanny'ing them with UAC etc and then they complain that they do not have to confirm an action they selected themselves? Mike Brannigan |
|
|
|
|
Mobilos |
|
Member

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Member No.: 455
Joined: 08-July 08

|
Justin wrote:
| QUOTE | | Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. |
Are you kidding? I'm so sick and tired of older versions of Windows asking "Are you sure?" every time I click something that I was absolutely delighted to see this nag gone. After all, it's not like it's possible to click "Log Off" accidentally. Bruce Chambers Help us help you: dts-l.org/goodpost.htm catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
realwx |
|
Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 106
Member No.: 1214
Joined: 27-July 07

|
Mike Brannigan wrote:
| QUOTE | There is no confirmation anymore - it was a pointless waste of time for a user to select to logoff or shutdown an XP system then then be asked again what they want to do. |
It's certainly an improvement.
| QUOTE | You are now assumed to be competent and that when you click to shutdown that is what you want to do , since you have to actively select one button then from a menu.
|
Well...., I don't think that assumption goes quite far enough, but it is an improvement, to be sure.
| QUOTE | | Am I the only one just getting so frustrated with people complaining about Vista nanny'ing them with UAC etc and then they complain that they do not have to confirm an action they selected themselves? |
Isn't irony a funny thing? Bruce Chambers Help us help you: dts-l.org/goodpost.htm catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
maggie |
|
Member
      
Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Member No.: 211
Joined: 24-February 08

|
DanS wrote:
| QUOTE | Justin, yo should not post using this name here. You MAY be mistaken for another Justin that is already here.
|
I daresay that the OP is perfectly entitled to use whatever name he likes, so long as he's not trying to impersonate anyone else. As for being mistaken for another "Justin," so what? The only people who have an imaginary beef with that "Justin" are trolls whose opinions don't carry any significant weight. Bruce Chambers Help us help you: dts-l.org/goodpost.htm catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. -Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
vorapoap |
|
Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 130
Member No.: 566
Joined: 23-August 07

|
in article OAh0WjMjHHA.492 TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl, Bruce Chambers at bchambers cable0ne.n3t wrote on 5/2/07 10:47 AM:
| QUOTE | Justin wrote: Does anyone else have issues with the Log Off button in the start menu not having a confirmation box? I cannot find any group policy to force it to confirm logging off either. Are you kidding? I'm so sick and tired of older versions of Windows asking "Are you sure?" every time I click something that I was absolutely delighted to see this nag gone. After all, it's not like it's possible to click "Log Off" accidentally. EXACTLY! I can't say how great this is that you can't hit close, restart, |
etc. by mistake. Lord only knows how many times I had wanted to put a computer (PC or MAC) to sleep and because maybe my attention was slightly pulled away I hit close or something. It takes 2 seconds to hit that second menu for what you want, if having to waste those 2 seconds is a problem then someone really needs to slow down their life a bit.
|
|
|
|
AlphaYoDa |
|
Member
 
Group: Members
Posts: 146
Member No.: 136
Joined: 31-October 07

|
Bruce Chambers wrote in news:ukj6SmMjHHA.1900 TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl:
| QUOTE | Justin, yo should not post using this name here. You MAY be mistaken for another Justin that is already here.
I daresay that the OP is perfectly entitled to use whatever name he likes, so long as he's not trying to impersonate anyone else. As for being mistaken for another "Justin," so what? The only people who have an imaginary beef with that "Justin" are trolls whose opinions don't carry any significant weight. |
Sure he has every right to use it.
|
|
|