32 Bit vs. 64 Bit VistaWindows Vista |
Help
Search
Members
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() |
| rfolwell | |||||
|
Member ![]() ![]()
Group: Members Posts: 129 Member No.: 1251 Joined: 26-June 08 |
I recently bought a laptop with a 64 bit processor, but the 32 bit version of Vista is what it came with.
Would it make it perform any better if it had come with the 64 bit version? Is there any way to get the other version? |
||||
| rachse | |||||
|
Member ![]() ![]()
Group: Members Posts: 122 Member No.: 115 Joined: 15-January 08 |
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:50:06 -0700, Mandi wrote:
Unless you need the extra memory addressability of 64 bits, or have 64-bit dependent applications, I would recommend using the 32-bit version of Vista. Why? Beacause there is a decided lack of 64-bit drivers for 3rd-party peripheral equipment, and a lot of stuff will just not work straight out of the box. 32-bit drivers have a lot more development priority, as that customer base is much, much larger. |
||||
| Mephisto |
Dec 2 2007, 11:33 AM | Tags: Bit
Bit
Related tags: Between Performance Question Usb Data Stationary Different Reset |
||||
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Group: Members Posts: 1188 Member No.: 41 Joined: 02-February 08 |
There is currently little to no benefit to running any 64-bit OS unless you either need to support more than 4gb of memory or if the applications you need to run are 64-bit apps. Many vendors don't have 64-bit drivers out there yet and you can't use 32-bit drivers instead. Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper gmail.com * NEW! Catch my blog ... msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/ * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * The Website - rgharper.mvps.org/ * HELP us help YOU ... dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "Mandi"
|
||||
| sippen | |||||
|
Member ![]() ![]()
Group: Members Posts: 105 Member No.: 239 Joined: 16-July 07 |
Mandi wrote:
Probably not.
Sure, contact the vendor of the laptop and ask if the 64 bit version is available for your particular laptop or you could always just purchase it after you determine you can find all the drivers you'll need. |
||||
| wojckr | |||||
|
Member ![]() ![]()
Group: Members Posts: 132 Member No.: 169 Joined: 26-November 07 |
So if I were to switch to the 64 bit version, chances are that my printer and scanner wouldn't work with my computer anymore (they are both quite a bit older than the new laptop)? Thanks for the input. I'm pretty illiterate when it comes to computers, but I did notice this the other day so I was wondering how much it would actually affect the performance (which I have no complaints about anyhow). "XS11E" wrote:
|
||||
| lackedcactus | |||||
|
Member
Group: Members Posts: 10 Member No.: 670 Joined: 28-February 08 |
Mandi wrote:
Correct. You'd need to visit the website(s) of the manufacturer(s) and see if they offer a download of Vista 64 drivers. If so, fine, if not, you'll have to think about upgrading the hardware along with the software. Sometimes, it's only a matter of time, I've had good luck getting drivers for my hardware but I noticed one thing, the older devices get the new drivers LAST! As you might expect, there's more demand for drivers for the newer devices and older printers, scanners, etc. are done on a "When we get around to it" basis. Other old stuff is so well established that drivers are built in, my ancient HP LaserJet 6L has built in drivers in Vista from the first beta versions. If you list specific hardware someone here will probably be able to tell you if there are drivers available.
Performance is relative. Years back I had an computer with an Intel 25DX chip and Windows 3.0, today I have an AMD Athlon 64 3400+ and BOTH computers would type this message at 30 wpm, I didn't gain a bit of speed by upgrading. <G> So if you're running some very intense software applications speed is very important but for many (or maybe I should say MOST) of us it doesn't matter very much. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |